Unknown, Future, Environment and Systemic

What connections can be made between perceived forms and human emotions? How do feedback mechanisms influence these manifestations? I conclude by exploring a multidisciplinary scientific approach, aiming to better understand these phenomena and move beyond the overly simplistic explanations that surround them.

While revisiting recent developments in the U.S., this presentation is, above all, methodological: it aims to demonstrate that we are not powerless when faced with the unknown. Every phenomenon, no matter how enigmatic, can be deconstructed and analyzed. This is an opportunity to introduce key concepts used by GEIPAN, such as strangeness and consistency. But beyond methodology, this is also a crucial reminder: we all know that Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) pose significant challenges for airspace security. Yet, they raise an even more fundamental question—are these manifestations the signature of non-human intelligences operating around our planet? As our technological capabilities advance, the possibility of detecting intelligent signals—whether within our own atmosphere or beyond—steadily increases. The probability of proving the existence of non-human intelligence is not zero, and it grows with each passing year. Such a revelation would mark the dawn of a new era for humanity, one defined by an unprecedented cultural and societal upheaval. In the face of this growing hypothesis, should governments remain passive, simply waiting for such a cultural shock to unfold? It is a question worth asking. The current conventional response remains: "We see no evidence that these unidentified objects in our skies pose a threat." A convenient reduction of information. But how different is this from a police officer responding to an emergency call by saying: "We see no evidence that the stranger sitting in your kitchen poses a threat. Sleep well." By understanding the stakes at hand, we can prepare for a future where humanity may one day engage with other civilizations. Until then, in a pragmatic and forward-thinking approach, we must unite individuals in a collective effort to research and understand—fostering a spirit of openness, humility, and collaboration.#Methodology

I believe the answer is yes, by structuring it in such a way as to favor the mechanisms of emergence. The approach is twofold: 1/ Granting cells autonomy, by embedding within them their own reproduction rules, rather than having them dictated by the environment. 2/ Allowing cells to transmit their genetic code to their descendants, creating a form of inheritance. By following this approach, one can fully adhere to the original rules of the Game of Life while introducing meaningful variations. Very quickly, intriguing structures begin to emerge, like the one attached here—self-organized, layered, and evolving across different levels of complexity. To bring complexity to life, one must work at the interfaces—those delicate boundaries where scales shift and orders break, fostering cooperation between cells in such a way that new, higher-order structures emerge, more organized than the underlying patterns that preceded them. This little project, developed in JavaScript, is now available on GitHub for exploration..

• As a bonus, a small 3D analysis program developed for this study.